Have We Already Discovered Alien Life—on Mars?

By Kevin Grazier | September 17, 2010 2:23 pm

Planets and moons do not give up their secrets willingly or easily — they make us work for every clue we get.  That seems particularly true when it comes to the search for extraterrestrial life. Even then, some bodies in the Solar System make us work harder than others.

Take Titan, for example. Two weeks ago, I wrote that observations of Titan from Cassini have been interpreted by some as possible signs of life, in particular:

Now it turns out that computer simulations based upon Cassini observations, simulations which hint at depletions of various chemical species at Titan’s surface may again hint at the possibility of life on Titan. The results are very preliminary, but fascinating nevertheless.

It’s highly unlikely that we’ll ever be able to make a positive determination if there’s life on Titan based upon Cassini data alone. Cassini is, after all, an orbiter, and its observations of Titan’s surface come from hundreds, even thousands, of kilometers away–limited to those that can be attained during flybys. To ascertain the presence of life, we’ll need what scientists in the field of remote sensing call “ground truth”–we’ll have to wait until we are able to send a followup probe to the surface of Titan. Perhaps we’ll send a probe to Titan similar to Tiny–the Titan rover who has guest-starred in episodes of this season’s Eureka.

Eureka-4_06-Tiny-threatens-them

Even then it could turn out that, unless NASA’s version of Tiny returns samples to Earth for human examination, the results could remain ambiguous and leave scientists scratching their heads. That is what’s happening with Mars.

Titan hides its secrets beneath a thick photochemical haze, but when it comes to planets that jealously guard their secrets, Mars is the champion. The Great Galactic Ghoul of Mars destroys our spacecraft. Mars throws us curve balls; Mars lies to us. Mars even laughs at the spacecraft it does allow to explore it.

When the twin Viking probes landed on Mars in 1976, eachviking carried three experiments designed to detect microbes in the Martian regolith (though the term “soil” is often used, we can’t really call it soil until we verify the presence of organics). Two of three Viking experiments produced negative results. The Viking Labeled Release (or LR) Experiment was a different matter, and seemed to indicate that there was life in the Martian regolith. Some scientists maintain to this day that the Viking LR experiment yielded a definite “Yes!” on the question of “Does Mars support life?”

In 2004 the European Space Agency probe Mars Express detected the presence of methane in the atmosphere of Mars. Methane can be produced geologically (and Mars is not short on volcanoes), or biologically. (Though media reports of that observation got a bit out of hand.) Either way, this is an important observation and research on the source of this methane is still ongoing.

Recent Earth-based experiments and observations by the Mars Phoenix lander serve only to muddy the waters still further, and reveal how Martian soil could be teeming with life that went undetected by Viking (and, interestingly, in experiments subsequent to the Viking mission, some bacteria in Earth soil also went undetected by Viking).

Curiosity RoverSize comparison between NASA’s Curiosity Rover and one of the Mars Exploration Rovers.

In November 2011, NASA will launch the Mars Science Laboratory rover, known as Curiosity–its Martian version of Eureka’s Tiny (though not nearly as intimidating). By far the largest Mars rover to date, Curiosity is the size of a Cooper Mini.  After a nine-month cruise, it will arrive at the Red Planet in August 2012. Rest assured that Curiosity will answer many of our existing questions about previous science results, and the potential existence of life on Mars. Rest assured that it will raise more questions.  If Curiosity gets past the Ghoul, it’ll be interesting to see if previous signatures detected by our probes did prove to be life.  It’ll also be interesting to see what tricks Mars has up its sleeve this time.

Comments (10)

  1. Life is one of those things that will sort of require a smoking gun to verify. Unless we come across something like tiny =)

  2. Torbjörn Larsson, OM

    Another plus for life on Titan is AFAIU that carbon isotope ratios differ from the solar average.

    A minus for life on Mars is that Earth methanogene metabolism phylogenetically only evolved once, in modern and specialized archaebacteria in the neomura lineage that is found time and time again in broadly samplings of genomes, based on bacterial methanophiles that evolved from an oxygenated metabolism.

    A priori that isn’t an easy metabolism to achieve anywhere and especially on Mars. You can argue contingency on phylogenetic analyses, but nevertheless that is the data we have.

  3. zebo

    In 1976 I waited 30 days; down to the final 30 seconds for Viking to land. Then another 30 days for results; which turned into 30 months; which eventually became a wait of over 30 years. Thats a long time to get a definitive answer of whether life is a common phenomenon in the Cosmos.

  4. Terry Martin

    Para 4: I guess you were not aware of the Titan descent probe on Cassini?

  5. Torbjörn – that’s a depressing point I’d never heard before. It doesn’t rule out microbial transfer from Earth, though.

  6. Magoo

    they detected farts on Mars.. what more do you want?

  7. Sion

    Mini Cooper, not Cooper Mini.

  8. This link shows NASA images that indicate there is life on Mars. It shows what can be speculated as being herd life forms:

    https://sites.google.com/site/tycho511/

  9. I suppose it’s also possible that methanogens evolved in an earlier climate, but on Earth they were then were replaced by modern versions that evolved a second time and replaced the older form.

  10. Hi, I can’t help it but those 2 photos supposedly on mars are photoshopped. The second one with many rocks. If you can notice it the rocks are very congested plus they have same size and shape. (they only differ in some rocks that are reversed horizontally or vertically. but they have the same size and shape. Picture number 2 is more worse. The light on the machines are behind them, so how come their rears are shining? moreover their color don’t blend in with the background itself.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »