<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Fiction and the Modding of Our Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/09/22/science-fiction-and-the-modding-of-our-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/09/22/science-fiction-and-the-modding-of-our-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/09/22/science-fiction-and-the-modding-of-our-future/#comment-3445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=2631#comment-3445</guid>
		<description>Science Fiction has the luxury of imagining What If.  It&#039;s purely conceptual in nature, and disregards matters of funding, the current state of knowledge, available technology, politics, and so forth.  That&#039;s the strength right there.

A scientist or technologist, or engineer, will often tell you that something is impossible.  They may mean that it&#039;s impossible right now.  However they are locked in the the state of the art today.  Nor can they see a path from today to a future where the something is possible.

I don&#039;t mean to diss the practical people.  You need them.  And let&#039;s face it, Sci-Fi is is also laced with Fantasy, improbabilities, and plenty of suggestions that violate all known laws of physics.  Nevertheless, Sci-Fi at it&#039;s best is an incubator for dreams.  It gives the builders a goalpost to move towards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science Fiction has the luxury of imagining What If.  It&#8217;s purely conceptual in nature, and disregards matters of funding, the current state of knowledge, available technology, politics, and so forth.  That&#8217;s the strength right there.</p>
<p>A scientist or technologist, or engineer, will often tell you that something is impossible.  They may mean that it&#8217;s impossible right now.  However they are locked in the the state of the art today.  Nor can they see a path from today to a future where the something is possible.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to diss the practical people.  You need them.  And let&#8217;s face it, Sci-Fi is is also laced with Fantasy, improbabilities, and plenty of suggestions that violate all known laws of physics.  Nevertheless, Sci-Fi at it&#8217;s best is an incubator for dreams.  It gives the builders a goalpost to move towards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/09/22/science-fiction-and-the-modding-of-our-future/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=2631#comment-3444</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
One of these is the idea of narrative fiction having organic unity that doesn’t take well to decomposition into the most adaptable and usable parts from a scientific perspective.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is the problem right there - science vs science fiction rejects that idea outright, yet the &quot;gap&quot; fantasies bar outsiders from accepting the fact, &lt;i&gt;despite this taking place in their chosen area of expertise&lt;/i&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Teleportation is an example of this: the quantum entanglement underlying recent examples  can only occur with zero-mass states of atoms, which is to say pure information, a bit of a problem for applying it to people a la Star Trek even with the most strenuous of diets. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not as I understand it, teleportation would work as portrayed in Stargate (the matter stream rings, not the wormhole gates): sending an entangled matter stream to constitute elsewhere, faster and more efficient than ships at short range.

And hell of a lot riskier! Luckily no one knows how to make it feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
One of these is the idea of narrative fiction having organic unity that doesn’t take well to decomposition into the most adaptable and usable parts from a scientific perspective.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That is the problem right there &#8211; science vs science fiction rejects that idea outright, yet the &#8220;gap&#8221; fantasies bar outsiders from accepting the fact, <i>despite this taking place in their chosen area of expertise</i>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Teleportation is an example of this: the quantum entanglement underlying recent examples  can only occur with zero-mass states of atoms, which is to say pure information, a bit of a problem for applying it to people a la Star Trek even with the most strenuous of diets. </p></blockquote>
<p>Not as I understand it, teleportation would work as portrayed in Stargate (the matter stream rings, not the wormhole gates): sending an entangled matter stream to constitute elsewhere, faster and more efficient than ships at short range.</p>
<p>And hell of a lot riskier! Luckily no one knows how to make it feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhacodactylus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/09/22/science-fiction-and-the-modding-of-our-future/#comment-3443</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhacodactylus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=2631#comment-3443</guid>
		<description>The well educated scientific community has a monopoly on almost everything else related to advancement, do they really have to claim that imagination is theirs as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The well educated scientific community has a monopoly on almost everything else related to advancement, do they really have to claim that imagination is theirs as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
