Zombies: Can You Kill the Undead?

By Kyle Munkittrick | October 30, 2010 10:02 am

Don't let him fake you out: he isn't looking at anything. The second you turn to look at whatever he sees, boom! Straight for the neck.Halloween is a-comin’ and this Sunday brings us AMC’s The Walking Dead. In honor of that, we’re discussing The Ethics of the Undead here at Science, Not Fiction. This is part III of IV. (Check out parts I, & II)

Are zombies really dead? How do we know? People are often reported “clinically dead” only to be revived later. If it is moving, if it reacts to stimuli like a food source or sounds, and if metabolic processes are in play, how can we call a zombie dead?

The most basic definition of life is the ability to have “signaling and self-sustaining processes” as the all-knowing Wikipedia tells us:

Living organisms undergo metabolism, maintain homeostasis, possess a capacity to grow, respond to stimuli, reproduce and, through natural selection, adapt to their environment in successive generations.

Zombies do indeed undergo a qualified form of metabolism, sort of maintain homeostasis, and definitely respond to stimuli. Alternately, zombies do not grow, reproduce, or go through natural selection. So much for a clear answer there.

Consider the following: When we “kill” something, we are implying that our action has made an “alive” thing “dead.” We commonly refer to “killing” zombies. Therefore, a zombie is alive until it is killed. Not quite, some might argue, a zombie is undead. Undead is a special word that describes an entity which was once alive in the full meaning of that word, then died, and was then re-animated (e.g. a zombie). The zombie was not re-vivified, that is, brought back to life, but its bare biological systems were re-started.

For example, dismembered frog legs that are given electrical shocks are not “alive” they are merely re-animated. But the frog leg example is insufficient, because the electrical shocks are external, and not part of an organism. In the case of a zombie, the electrical shocks that trigger muscle movement are, as with a living being, generated internally by metabolic processes and neural pathways. The frog legs are not “re-animated,” just artificially stimulated.

At the other end of the spectrum, how about a person who has a heart attack and, due to a delay in resuscitation, temporarily experiences cardio-pulmonary-death and brain-death: a total cessation in life functions. The person is, for a moment, clinically dead. That person is then successfully revived. The heart and lungs begin functioning again and the re-oxygenated brain “comes back to life” with no harm done. This person who is “back from the grave” is revivified. Though their biological functions ceased, for a variety of reasons the destructive postmortem processes were delayed long enough to allow total system restoration.

A zombie isn’t a shocked frog leg nor is it a revived person. Instead, we want to understand whether or not a moving, metabolizing, stimulus-responding corpse is alive. I submit that various parts of a zombie may resemble life, but in reality, it has less “life” than the bacterium eating its eyeball. It is more accurate to say that the pathogen inside the zombie is alive, while the corpse itself is dead. The corpse, as noted in my description of a zombie, is in a constant state of decomposition. While decomposition may be slowed by the pathogen, the process is not stopped.

Most important to the entire discussion, however, is brain activity. Though the body and some parts of the brain stem are reactivated, a zombie is, quite literally, brain-dead. Beating-heart cadavers are a primary example of a “functioning” body preserved by external means. In a zombie, organs function independently to a minimal degree and reflexes (such as balance) exist to some extent. Thus, while the zombie pathogen would do more than our current medical technology can do for a beating-heart cadaver, it neither reverses brain-death nor does it properly maintain basic conditions of life like metabolic processes or homeostasis. Some specific stimulus response systems are re-animated, but this is an illusion of bodily life, not an actual case of life.

Thus, a zombie is a dead body that affects some life-like behavior because it is being controlled by a living pathogen. “Killing” a zombie is, in effect, destroying it in a sufficient way to prevent the pathogen from utilizing the corpse.

Promotional Image via AMCtv.com

Comments (10)

Links to this Post

  1. Zombies! Zombies everywhere! - Nerdcore | October 31, 2010
  1. Chris

    If I understand this correctly, the undead brain lacks many of the fuctions of a living brain, but the zombie pathogen still allows enough brain activity to control motor functions (albeit poorly), and enough sensory function to allow the undead to seek flesh by whatever means (I would assume vision is the primary means of target identification) and a few other basic thought processes.

    If all this is correct, then it stands to reason that the physical destruction of the brain would disable these capabilities and render the zombie, if not un-undead, at least inert.

    In short, the ole “12-gauge to the noggin” solution should work just fine. Hopefully.

  2. Any major damage to the central nervous system should do the trick. For that matter, a functioning brain implies a functioning heart, lungs, kidney, etc. That’s why I never liked the idea that zombies could only be stopped by destroying their brains.

  3. @Romeo & Chris: you are both right, as far as my analysis goes. It’s scary to think of just how little our body might actually need for minimal functioning.

  4. dave chamberlin

    Everybody is so racist when it comes to zombies. Who is to say you can’t put them on a leash and tame them with a steady diet of kool aid and hot dogs. Of course you wouldn’t let them in the house, but you could give them a doghouse in the backyard and run an extension cord to an electric blanket. They will of course be worthless except as gaurd zombies, but they would be damned good at that. Why you can leave them in your parked car with the windows up and nobody will steal your car. Of course they would have to be trained at no biting before you could go that far.

  5. Chris

    Yeah, but who wants their house and car to smell like decaying flesh all the time?

    Wet dog smell is bad enough. Wet Zombie… ugh.

  6. Chris

    Romeo,

    While I’m sure that taking out the heart, lungs, etc. would eventually put a zombie down, I’m not sure that it would do it fast enough. When the flesh-supping hordes are bearing down on you, you want rapid incapacitation, and nothing says “rapid incapacitation” like a head shot.

  7. Tom

    An interesting potentiality is the evolution of the zombie pathogen. While, according to your analysis, the corpse is not alive, the pathogen is. So, given enough time and selection pressure, we would expect to see an evolution of the pathogen. Such an evolution would, I think, produce the effects of having less/slower decomposition effects on its hijacked corpses and/or producing increased ability to reproduce itself, either in terms of endogenous capacity or its ability to infect/hijack more or better suited corpse-hosts. Also, there would be the potential for piggyback traits which would be impossible to predict.

    However, since you stipulate that the pathogen would have to be engineered, it may be about as efficient as its going to get at the initial outbreak point, though some evolution would still occur given the sufficient time and selection pressure.

    One potential design feature could be a well balanced mutative tendency which would keep the pathogen stable enough to maintain its core functionality but adapt to potential environmental changes or unforeseen factors.

  8. It is evident that you like doing what you do as your enthusiasm can be seen in all your work. Don’t ever let the passion pass on as we are here always looking forward to what you have in store for us. Thanks for your eagerness to share your stunning masterpieces.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »