Comments on: Searching For the Future http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/12/23/searching-for-the-future/ Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:57:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Al Cibiades http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/12/23/searching-for-the-future/#comment-4069 Al Cibiades Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:21:28 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=3480#comment-4069 Self-referential, Godel's Incompleteness Theorem, and Wittgenstein's Propositions #6 and #7...Since the entire class of all relevant documentation is NOT available within Google (yet?), what is graphed represents a view with a skew. Self-referential, Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem, and Wittgenstein’s Propositions #6 and #7…Since the entire class of all relevant documentation is NOT available within Google (yet?), what is graphed represents a view with a skew.

]]> By: Chris Winter http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/12/23/searching-for-the-future/#comment-4068 Chris Winter Thu, 06 Jan 2011 01:53:29 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=3480#comment-4068 I hope I didn't kill this thread with my off-the-wall comment. It could well be that the total volume of the first four blogs you searched tails off after 1990, while yours expanded in output. I do hope you return to this topic. I hope I didn’t kill this thread with my off-the-wall comment. It could well be that the total volume of the first four blogs you searched tails off after 1990, while yours expanded in output. I do hope you return to this topic.

]]> By: Chris Winter http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/12/23/searching-for-the-future/#comment-4067 Chris Winter Fri, 31 Dec 2010 01:34:56 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=3480#comment-4067 It could be that you are from the future, and the others aren't. There's a line from <i>Star Trek</i>... How did it go? "Improve a machine and you may gain a few percentage points of efficiency. But improve a man, and you gain a thousandfold!" Or something like that. Which leads me to wonder: Could you be Khan Nuniyan Singh? ;-) It could be that you are from the future, and the others aren’t. There’s a line from Star Trek… How did it go? “Improve a machine and you may gain a few percentage points of efficiency. But improve a man, and you gain a thousandfold!” Or something like that.

Which leads me to wonder: Could you be Khan Nuniyan Singh?
;-)

]]> By: Kyle Munkittrick http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/12/23/searching-for-the-future/#comment-4066 Kyle Munkittrick Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:26:15 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=3480#comment-4066 Ah! Whoopsies! Misread the bottom of your blog as the author of the site, not the wordpress theme, sorry! Error corrected. Sorry, D. Ah! Whoopsies! Misread the bottom of your blog as the author of the site, not the wordpress theme, sorry! Error corrected. Sorry, D.

]]> By: D. Boucher http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2010/12/23/searching-for-the-future/#comment-4065 D. Boucher Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:58:53 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=3480#comment-4065 Hi Kyle, I just wanted to specify that Derek Powazek is not the author of The Economic Word, I am. Good post. Cheers, David Hi Kyle,

I just wanted to specify that Derek Powazek is not the author of The Economic Word, I am.
Good post.

Cheers,

David

]]>