<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;StunRay,&#8221; a Light Weapon That Overstimulates the Brain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/</link>
	<description>The science of futurist technologies—and an excuse to soak in sci-fi TV shows, books, movies, toys, and video games.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Hoboy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-29518</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Hoboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=4176#comment-29518</guid>
		<description>On the safety questions, subject studies of the XL-2000 effect have provided a comprehensive safety review concluding the direct application of the XL-2000 incoherent light beam is a safe less/non lethal defensive weapon. 

The report  “Integrated Safety Hazard Analysis of the Genesis Illumination Inc StunRay™ XL-2000” study by Dr. Neil Choplin concluded, based on extensive clinical evaluation by board-certified ophthalmologists of multiple subjects exposed to the broadband incoherent optical radiation produced by the StunRay, that there was no detected evidence of any structural or functional alterations in the eyes or visual system following the exposure.

Persons exposed to the beam over 3 years ago during R&amp;D still show no adverse side effects.

Loren Hoboy-Genesis Illumination</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the safety questions, subject studies of the XL-2000 effect have provided a comprehensive safety review concluding the direct application of the XL-2000 incoherent light beam is a safe less/non lethal defensive weapon. </p>
<p>The report  “Integrated Safety Hazard Analysis of the Genesis Illumination Inc StunRay™ XL-2000” study by Dr. Neil Choplin concluded, based on extensive clinical evaluation by board-certified ophthalmologists of multiple subjects exposed to the broadband incoherent optical radiation produced by the StunRay, that there was no detected evidence of any structural or functional alterations in the eyes or visual system following the exposure.</p>
<p>Persons exposed to the beam over 3 years ago during R&amp;D still show no adverse side effects.</p>
<p>Loren Hoboy-Genesis Illumination</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-29330</link>
		<dc:creator>Georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=4176#comment-29330</guid>
		<description>SAS has a kind of pyrotechnical &quot;flashlight&quot; for stunning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAS has a kind of pyrotechnical &#8220;flashlight&#8221; for stunning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GAC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-29315</link>
		<dc:creator>GAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=4176#comment-29315</guid>
		<description>I would worry about it causing permanent loss of sight -- either partial or total blindness.  But otherwise, it seems a much better choice than a taser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would worry about it causing permanent loss of sight &#8212; either partial or total blindness.  But otherwise, it seems a much better choice than a taser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pond</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-29298</link>
		<dc:creator>pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=4176#comment-29298</guid>
		<description>This is the first flashy thingy from men in black!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first flashy thingy from men in black!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pond</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-29297</link>
		<dc:creator>pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=4176#comment-29297</guid>
		<description>Is this the flashy thingy from men in black???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the flashy thingy from men in black???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Winter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-29294</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=4176#comment-29294</guid>
		<description>Life imitating art: The 1981 film &lt;i&gt;Looker&lt;/i&gt; had as one plot device a high-tech flashlight that could &#8212; for a few seconds &#8212;  immobilize anyone into whose eyes it was shown.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082677/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life imitating art: The 1981 film <i>Looker</i> had as one plot device a high-tech flashlight that could &mdash; for a few seconds &mdash;  immobilize anyone into whose eyes it was shown.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082677/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082677/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/2011/04/05/stunray-a-light-weapon-that-overstimulates-the-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-29286</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/sciencenotfiction/?p=4176#comment-29286</guid>
		<description>Interesting...does it cause photosensitive seizures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;does it cause photosensitive seizures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-26 18:18:13 -->
