People prefer mates with a 22% resemblance to themselves.

By Seriously Science | July 24, 2013 2:42 pm

Figure 1. The Prototypes.

People generally prefer mates that resemble themselves (except perhaps when they’re stressed out). But how much of a resemblance is ideal? Too much, and you risk mating with a close relative, but not enough and maybe you end up mating with someone from a warring tribe. Here, the researchers photoshopped people’s faces into those of their romantic partners, varying the amount of each face in the resulting blend. They then had the subject rate the attractiveness of each morphed face. They found that adding 22% of the subject’s own face made their partner the most attractive (versus 11% and 33%). Not only that, but the subject didn’t even realize that their partner’s face had been morphed with their own. Apparently we’re all just narcissists at heart.

Is beauty in the face of the beholder?

“Opposing forces influence assortative mating so that one seeks a similar mate while at the same time avoiding inbreeding with close relatives. Thus, mate choice may be a balancing of phenotypic similarity and dissimilarity between partners. In the present study, we assessed the role of resemblance to Self’s facial traits in judgments of physical attractiveness. Participants chose the most attractive face image of their romantic partner among several variants, where the faces were morphed so as to include only 22% of another face. Participants distinctly preferred a “Self-based morph” (i.e., their partner’s face with a small amount of Self’s face blended into it) to other morphed images. The Self-based morph was also preferred to the morph of their partner’s face blended with the partner’s same-sex “prototype”, although the latter face was (“objectively”) judged more attractive by other individuals. When ranking morphs differing in level of amalgamation (i.e., 11% vs. 22% vs. 33%) of another face, the 22% was chosen consistently as the preferred morph and, in particular, when Self was blended in the partner’s face. A forced-choice signal-detection paradigm showed that the effect of self-resemblance operated at an unconscious level, since the same participants were unable to detect the presence of their own faces in the above morphs. We concluded that individuals, if given the opportunity, seek to promote “positive assortment” for Self’s phenotype, especially when the level of similarity approaches an optimal point that is similar to Self without causing a conscious acknowledgment of the similarity.”

Related content:
NCBI ROFL: If I’m not hot, are you hot or not? Physical attractiveness evaluations and dating preferences as a function of one’s own attractiveness.
NCBI ROFL: Effects of stress on human mating preferences: stressed individuals prefer dissimilar mates.
NCBI ROFL: Beer goggles explained!

CATEGORIZED UNDER: feelings shmeelings
  • http://fortheloveofthecreator.blogspot.com/ SHAHARIL AHMAD

    Well this explain alot!

  • Osmo Tammisalo

    Would the results be the same in cultures where there are no mirrors? Or what if the mirrors had been somehow distorted for all your life?

  • Hawkeye72

    Do people actually get paid to sit around and make up this B.S.? How about this?19.6% of all people have swallowed a pine cone. It’s just as valid as this. Probably more so.

  • rameshraghuvanshi

    My observation is boys intimated or say see mother`s face in his fiancee because boys first see face of mother and never forget her first love.and girls prefer lover resemblance themselves because women are naturally narcissus.

    • Sari Csollany

      You had me till that last line, which is simply your own irrational misogynous views coming through. My own observations have been that males fall for partners that remind them of their mother whereas females fall for partners that remind them of their father. Which of course, being their genetic offspring, means that the partners that we are attracted to would also look somewhat like ourselves.

      I would go one step further and maintain that it is not so much our biological mother or father we seek in our partner, but the figures that represent them. I was raised without my father in the picture and I have found that for myself that it is not men that look like father that I am attracted to, but men that look like my maternal uncle who was the only grown male role model I had growing up.

      • rameshraghuvanshi

        Not actually mother or father but their image which inserted in our unconscious mind in childhood which dominated in our psyche which governed on us.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Seriously, Science?

Seriously, Science?, formerly known as NCBI ROFL, is the brainchild of two prone-to-distraction biologists. We highlight the funniest, oddest, and just plain craziest research from the PubMed research database and beyond. Because nobody said serious science couldn't be silly!
Follow us on Twitter: @srslyscience.
Send us paper suggestions: srslyscience[at]gmail.com.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »