Do lesbians have better gaydar than straight women?

By Seriously Science | August 21, 2013 12:00 pm

Photo: flickr/PhotoCatcher

As we all know, “gaydar” refers to a person’s ability to identify someone as homosexual based only on looking at them and observing their behavior. A previous study found that women’s gaydar works better during ovulation (when it presumably is more important that it works correctly…). This study set out to test whether gaydar abilities differ between lesbians and straight women. Turns out that both groups were better at identifying homosexual women than men, but lesbian women were actually more likely to label someone as homosexual who actually wasn’t. Wishful thinking? 

Detection of Sexual Orientation (“Gaydar”) by Homosexual and Heterosexual Women.

“Although there has been considerable research investigating the ability to identify sexual orientation from static images, or “gaydar,” few studies have considered the role of female sexual orientation or sexual interest (for example, sociosexual orientation) in judgment accuracy. In two studies, we investigated the sexuality detection ability, and masculinity and femininity as cues used in judgment. In Study 1, we recruited heterosexual (N = 55) and homosexual (N = 71) women to rate the sexual orientation of homosexual and heterosexual male and female targets (N = 80: 20 heterosexual men, 20 homosexual men, 20 heterosexual women, and 20 homosexual women). We found that detection accuracy was better than chance levels for both male and female targets and that male targets were more likely to be falsely labeled as homosexual than female targets were. Overall, female faces were more accurately identified as heterosexual or homosexual than male faces and homosexual female raters were biased towards labeling targets as homosexual. Sociosexuality did not influence the accuracy with which targets were identified as heterosexual or homosexual. In Study 2, 100 heterosexual and 20 homosexual women rated the stimulus for masculinity and femininity. Heterosexual women were rated as more feminine and less masculine than homosexual women and homosexual men were rated as more feminine and less masculine than heterosexual men. Sexual orientation of the judges did not affect the ratings. The results were discussed with a reference to evolutionary and cultural influences affecting sexual orientation judgment accuracy.”

Related content:
NCBI ROFL: Gaydar doesn’t work as well on upside-down faces.
NCBI ROFL: Women’s gaydar improves during ovulation.
NCBI ROFL: Think you’re good at recognizing celebrities? Think again!

CATEGORIZED UNDER: reinforcing stereotypes
  • Anne Haehl

    I’m not sure why this is a subject of scientific concern, but since it is, I should think a study of looking at people, how they move etc. would be much more valid in relation to how people function in the real world.

  • randy brown

    i hope my tax dollars werent wasted on this bs

  • Seriously

    it is very obvious why us Straight Guys can’t meet a decent woman anymore nowadays.

  • Δημητρης Ιωαννου

    “in study 2, 100 heterosexual women…”

    The whole study is false. Where did they find 100 heterosexual women?!

    the existence of “heterosexual women” is an urban legend

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Seriously, Science?

Seriously, Science?, formerly known as NCBI ROFL, is the brainchild of two prone-to-distraction biologists. We highlight the funniest, oddest, and just plain craziest research from the PubMed research database and beyond. Because nobody said serious science couldn't be silly!
Follow us on Twitter: @srslyscience.
Send us paper suggestions: srslyscience[at]gmail.com.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »