Flashback Friday: Have a song stuck in your head? Here’s how to get rid of it.

By Seriously Science | March 10, 2017 6:00 am
Photo: flickr/jonny goldstein

Photo: flickr/jonny goldstein

We’ve all experienced it: the dreaded “earworm,” in which a song keeps playing in your head long after you’ve heard it on the radio. The causes of this phenomenon are still unclear, although studies suggest that random events, sounds, and thoughts may be to blame, and it might happen more often when we are thinking too much or too little. But more important is knowing how how to get rid of this “involuntary musical imagery”–especially when you’re already sick of hearing “Royals” on the radio, much less in your head. In this study, researchers surveyed a group of British subjects about how they get rid of earworms. The most common approaches were either exposure therapy — that is, listening to the song in question — or distraction. Interestingly, listening to a “cure tune” was a common approach, and the same cure tunes were actually reported by multiple people in the study. The top song? “God Save the Queen”, followed by “Karma Chameleon”, “Happy Birthday”, “Theme to the A-Team”, “Kashmir”, and “Sledgehammer.” But how did they get “Karma Chameleon” out of their head?

Sticky Tunes: How Do People React to Involuntary Musical Imagery?

“The vast majority of people experience involuntary musical imagery (INMI) or ‘earworms’; perceptions of spontaneous, repetitive musical sound in the absence of an external source. The majority of INMI episodes are not bothersome, while some cause disruption ranging from distraction to anxiety and distress. To date, little is known about how the majority of people react to INMI, in particular whether evaluation of the experience impacts on chosen response behaviours or if attempts at controlling INMI are successful or not. The present study classified 1046 reports of how people react to INMI episodes. Two laboratories in Finland and the UK conducted an identical qualitative analysis protocol on reports of INMI reactions and derived visual descriptive models of the outcomes using grounded theory techniques. Combined analysis carried out across the two studies confirmed that many INMI episodes were considered neutral or pleasant, with passive acceptance and enjoyment being among the most popular response behaviours. A significant number of people, however, reported on attempts to cope with unwanted INMI. The most popular and effective behaviours in response to INMI were seeking out the tune in question, and musical or verbal distraction. The outcomes of this study contribute to our understanding of the aetiology of INMI, in particular within the framework of memory theory, and present testable hypotheses for future research on successful INMI coping strategies.”

Related content:
NCBI ROFL: National anthems and suicide rates.
NCBI ROFL: Gibbons singing on helium. For science.
NCBI ROFL: Head and neck injury risks in heavy metal: head bangers stuck between rock and a hard bass.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: feelings shmeelings
  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

    The outcomes of this study contribute to our understanding of the aetiology of” Do a double shift at Disney’s “It’s a Small World” ride, Youtube v=-kIC7xGACds. We’ll carry you out screaming. Jose Martinez in 2009 was only stuck in there for a half-hour. He successfully brought suit against the Mouse for pain and suffering, having gone mad for three hours thereafter.

    • OWilson

      Suddenly that ISIS stuff makes a little sense! :)

      • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

        The call to prayer, call to prayer, call to prayer…. You need not submit. We will submit you. As always, God never complains about who won. Contrast this with Coventry where Lady Godiva (1050s and sidesaddle – you pigs) protested taxation and Winston Churchill let them be splattered for having been cheeky (14 November 1940) re Ultra prior warning.

  • aka darrell

    Interesting that this comes up so often on forums and blogs. For some it must be a problem. I use what this article calls a “cure tune”; a children’s ditty about Itsy Bitsy Spider.

    • donald-wright@mail.ru

      I’ve profited 104,000 bucks previous year by doing an on-line job at my house a­­n­­d I was able to do it by wo­rking in my own time f­­o­­r 3+ hours each day. I was following a business opportunity I was introduced by this web-site i found online and I am excited that i made such great money. It’s very user friendly a­n­d I’m just so blessed that i learned about it. Here’s what I do… http://urlof­.­site/qYSkQ

    • robin.trimble

      I’ve profited 104,000 bucks in last 12 months by doing an on-line job from my house a­­n­­d I manage to earn that much by wor­king part-time f­o­r 3 or sometimes more hours every day. I used an earning model I was introduced by this website i found on-line and I am happy that I was able to earn so much extra income. It’s very user friendly a­n­d I’m just so thankful that i found this. This is what i did… http://gee­.­su/YzQ65

    • james_rodriguez

      I was paid 104000 dollars past 12 months by doing an internet work moreover I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r quite a few hours during the day. I used job opportunity I found out on the net and therefore I am thrilled that I was manage to earn such decent earnings. It’s actually newbie-friendly and therefore I am so delighted that I discovered out regarding it. Look into what I do… I was without work for six months time when my former Fellow worker ultimately strongly suggested me to get into freelancing online… It was only just after I gained $5000 in my very first 30 days when I really believed I am able to do this for a living! At this moment I am happier than ever… I work-at-home and I am my own boss now like I always wanted… I see a lot of unsatisfied people around me, working the same old boring job that’s sucking the life out of them day by day… Everytime I see someone like that I say START FREELANCING MAN! This is where I started off >>>> www­.­cat­.­org­.­uk/snip/31323


Seriously, Science?

Seriously, Science?, formerly known as NCBI ROFL, is the brainchild of two prone-to-distraction biologists. We highlight the funniest, oddest, and just plain craziest research from the PubMed research database and beyond. Because nobody said serious science couldn't be silly!
Follow us on Twitter: @srslyscience.
Send us paper suggestions: srslyscience[at]gmail.com.

See More


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar