Flashback Friday: Scientists analyzed orgasms in the 50 most-viewed videos on PornHub. Here’s what they found.

By Seriously Science | July 6, 2018 6:00 am
Photo: flickr/Colby Stopa

Photo: flickr/Colby Stopa

It’s probably no surprise to anyone that watching pornography can give unrealistic expectations of what sex is really like. But how skewed is this representation? These heroic scientists took it upon themselves to find out. To do so, they watched the top 50 most-viewed videos on PornHub, and recorded “the frequency of male and female orgasm, orgasm-inducing sex acts (and whether activity inducing female orgasms included some form of clitoral stimulation), and auditory (verbal, vocal) and visual (bodily) indicators of orgasm.” They found that 78% of men but only 18.3% of women were shown reaching orgasm in popular porn videos, and thus concluded that “representations of male and female orgasm in mainstream pornography may serve to perpetuate unrealistic beliefs and expectations in relation to female orgasm and male sexual performance.” Ya think?

Consuming Ecstasy: Representations of Male and Female Orgasm in Mainstream Pornography.

“Social representations, which appear in a variety of media, can influence the way sexual experiences are perceived and understood. While pornography is not the only medium in which orgasm is portrayed, it is the most explicit, and it is widespread and easily accessible. As such, pornography is an ideal medium for examining representations of male and female orgasm. PornHub’s 50 most viewed videos of all time were viewed and coded for the frequency of male and female orgasm, orgasm-inducing sex acts (and whether activity inducing female orgasms included some form of clitoral stimulation), and auditory (verbal, vocal) and visual (bodily) indicators of orgasm. Content analysis was used to code and analyze the data. Results were analyzed in light of sexual script theory and previous orgasm research. Only 18.3% of women, compared to 78.0% of men, were shown reaching orgasm. Sex differences in depictions of orgasm, beyond the appearance of semen, were documented. Results support the male performance script as evident in pornographic depictions of orgasm, as well as coital and orgasm imperatives. As a result, representations of male and female orgasm in mainstream pornography may serve to perpetuate unrealistic beliefs and expectations in relation to female orgasm and male sexual performance.”

Related content:
Flashback Friday: Insect fossil porn: Jurassic edition.
Flashback Friday: What can 2,914 Australian twins tell us about the evolution of the female orgasm?
Scientists repeatedly watch 10 couples having sex to determine positions best for men with bad backs.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/EquivPrinFail.pdf Uncle Al

    It’s probably no surprise to anyone that watching pornography can give unrealistic expectations of what sex is really like.” Why go for the easy case? Target the Big Three: religion. economics, public education..

    How does one reliably ascertain by remote observation when a female has an orgasm – EEG telemetry? Bat Mitzvah Girls in Bondage, XXXVII: Tefillin Terrors

    • OWilson

      Pornography can be educational, and is often socially redeeming.

      Watch “Ilsa, She Wolf of the Nazis”, and you’ll never tolerate dominance ever again!

      Maybe :)

  • Not_that_anyone_cares, but…

    This is why I only watch lesbian videos. Why would I watch male orgasms when I can see my own?

    • Bananadrama

      I only watch gay men (and I’m a woman). I just think it’s interesting and doubles my viewing pleasure.

  • M⃠ ⃠S⃠ ⃠i⃠ ⃠N⃠ ⃠L⃠u⃠n⃠d⃠

    None for me thanks!
    I only get off from watching orange clown jerk-offs.
    So I get all my jollies from Fox news.

    • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/EquivPrinFail.pdf Uncle Al

      My jolly is in November when the “Blue Wave” flushes the Democrat Party out of Congress. I was a professional sperm donor. I know the difference between “altruistic qualia” and “sybaritic annihilation.”

      As with porn and female orgasms, how can Americans so easily believe the truth when corrupt vendors incessantly drown them in ever louder lies?

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Seriously, Science?

Seriously, Science?, formerly known as NCBI ROFL, is the brainchild of two prone-to-distraction biologists. We highlight the funniest, oddest, and just plain craziest research from the PubMed research database and beyond. Because nobody said serious science couldn't be silly!
Follow us on Twitter: @srslyscience.
Send us paper suggestions: srslyscience[at]gmail.com.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+