Rogue Actors and the Coming Space Law Crisis

By Jeffrey Marlow | January 25, 2017 9:17 am
A night launch for SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket. (Image: Flickr/SpaceX)

A night launch for SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket. (Image: Flickr/SpaceX)

Launching rockets into space has traditionally been the domain of nation states: only a handful of countries over the last several decades have mounted the technical expertise and financial resources to put payloads in orbit. With so few players, outer space was governed by the “Cold War principles” outlined in the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, which holds nation states accountable and reserves the use of space for scientific study and other peaceful purposes.

Today, space law needs an overhaul, according to James Gilley, an Instructor of International Studies at Louisiana State University. After all, some of the key assumptions that underlie the Outer Space Treaty no longer apply. A wide range of entities, from treaty non-signatories to private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin, are charging into low Earth orbit and beyond, and their intentions are unlikely to be restricted to scientific research.

“We’ve kind of forgotten as an international community that we’ve written laws about this stuff,” says Gilley, “because nothing has truly upset the apple cart.” But that could change soon, and Gilley points to a few plausible cases where rogue actors could set off an international legal crisis.

The first possibility involves non-signatory state actors – there are roughly 70 – establishing a presence in space and pursuing illicit activities. Chances of this scenario playing out are relatively low, since most of the potential nations lack launch capabilities and even traditional rabble rousers like North Korea have actually signed the treaty. Another option is the “flag of convenience” scenario, under which private corporations base their operations in non-signatory countries – likely small developed nations – to avoid the constrictions of the treaty.

But the most likely rogue actors, according to Gilley, are private companies operating within countires – like the United States – that have signed the treaty. To date, private launches have been assumed to operate under the legal auspices of the launch site country. If a SpaceX rocket launched from Florida were to disintigrate and cause damage in Europe, for example, the U.S. would be held responsible.

But this cozy agreement between corporations and home countries could change, particularly if a company rejects the regulatory framework of its home nation, or is seen to be reckless. Economic considerations could also challenge the status quo. “If someone goes out and starts mining asteroids,” explains Gilley, “this could collapse resource markets” and countries with strong financial dependence on natural resources could stage a legal revolt.

As for a fourth rogue actor scenario – of private companies launching from international waters – well, “we haven’t written laws on that,” says Gilley. “But it’s going to happen, and we need to clarify what’s going on.”

This prognosticating may seem academic for the time being, but given the magnitude of the issues at stake – weaponization of space, accidents involving nuclear propulsion, or the reconfiguration of global markets – it’s best to be proactive. And these kinds of large, international treaties don’t change overnight. The United Nations Law of the Sea took 15 years to modify, Gilley notes, “so we might not have the time to revise this before it becomes a very important issue.”

Gilley doesn’t have a new draft ready to go; he’s mostly interested in starting the discussion. “I think you still need to include a voice for traditional nation states,” he says, “and balance it with private entities, while including average citizens as well.”

CATEGORIZED UNDER: space & physics, technology, top posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

    If a SpaceX rocket launched from Florida were to disintegrate and cause damage in Europe, for example, the U.S. would be held responsible.” Nonsense- by example.

    Australia’s Shire of Esperance was space-bombed by NASA debris 12 July 1979. Subsequent pursuit for damages ($400 fine for littering) was ignored. Drop anything you like anywhere. If it is by accident (negligence) with a passive impactor, victims’ compensation has no legal remedy by precedent. Bodily injury and death may not be covered.

    • http://secure49.com Aiden Diaz

      This is the way it is possible to make quite good profit every month… You can do it for yourself! After been without work for six months, I started off freelancing over this website and finally i couldn’t be pleased. After six months time on my new job my regular monthly earnings are around 12k a month…>>FACEBOOK.COM/For-US-UK-Canada-Australia-and-New-Zealand-1081278581977571/app/208195102528120/

  • OWilson

    God forbid anyone should dare to drain the swamp by obtaining cheaper minerals from asteroids, or even cheaper oil.

    It’s the full time job of governments to protect the status quo of inefficiency at all costs.

    The hand shovel industry needs all the help it can get!

    • Harry Scheuerle

      Nice

      • TC

        Oil from an asteroid perhaps? More likely different metals and rare earth metals which would affect poorer countries rich in raw resources but poor in industrial resources.

        Drain the swamp? WTF? It wouldn’t be some small business doing it. It would be SpaceX getting rich. I don’t see how making it a corporate space race without even regulating air traffic, liability or almost anything else having to do with space travel. Perhaps read about the gilded era before u dismiss corporate regulations

        • nancy_hall_91@mail.ru

          I have earned $104,000 in last 12 months by working from my house and I did it by working part-time for 3+ h on daily basis. I was following work model I found on-line and I am thrilled that i made so much money on the side. It’s so newbie friendly and I am just so thankful that i found it. Here is what i did…FACEBOOK.COM/Work-at-home-for-New-zealand-Australia-Canada-US-and-UK-245151529228936/app/208195102528120/

        • http://secure51.com Brenda Boyd

          I have profited 104,000 thousand dollars in last 12 months by freelancing online a­n­d I manage to accomplish that by working in my own time f­o­r 3 or sometimes more h every day. I was following a money making opportunity I stumbled upon online and I am amazed that I was able to earn so much money on the side. It’s very beginner-friendly and I am just so thankful that I found out about it. Here is what i did… TIMELY84.COM

  • http://cosmic.lifeform.org/ Thomas Lee Elifritz

    Space lawyers caused the orbital debris problem.

    Space law and space lawyers are the problem, not the solution.

    Governments need to step in and legislate the problem that space lawyers have created through their neglect of the problem, which essentially was created by the Outer Space Treaty in 1966. In 1966 there was very little space debris. Now it’s a serious and nearly intractible problem. I blame this treaty and those so call ‘space lawyers’.

    And guess what, I can name names. Eilene Galloway comes to mind.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

The Extremo Files

The Extremo Files traces the science that is pushing the boundaries of biology, from the deep sea to outer space to the brave new world of synthetic biology.

About Jeffrey Marlow

Jeffrey Marlow is a geobiologist exploring the limits of life, from the role of microbes in global elemental cycles to the possibility of life beyond Earth and the brave new world of synthetic biology. He received his PhD from the California Institute of Technology and is currently a Postdoctoral Scholar at Harvard University, where he studies the inner workings of methane-metabolizing organisms.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+