# Why Apollo Flew in a Figure 8

By Amy Shira Teitel | April 21, 2018 1:35 pm

If you’ve ever looked at a schematic for an Apollo flight like the one on the left, you’ll notice right away that it traces out a figure 8, which leads many to wonder why? Surely it’s easier to go in a straight line, right? Turns out, it was the safest way to travel.

There are a few things at play here that come together to make it a figure 8, so let’s start with a quick video explainer that has some visuals that will help. And then we can jump into the mission in more detail starting from a launch.

The Earth, if we think about it from a position hovering somewhere above the North Pole, rotates from west to east, which happens to be the same direction it travels around the Sun. The Moon does the same thing. It rotates west to east and travels around the Earth in the same direction, though of course, it’s day is equivalent to one month on Earth. In both cases, the eastern edge of the body, the edge towards which all that momentum goes, is called the leading edge. The opposite side away from which all that momentum goes is called the trailing edge. (To clarify because I didn’t make it totally clear in the video above: it’s the spin and the direction of travel that matters here.)

This becomes important when you do a gravity assist, also called a fly by. A spacecraft smaller than a planet — let’s say the Apollo spacecraft which is much smaller than the Moon — is affected by all the bodies near it, in this case, the Sun, the Earth, and everything else that’s exerting a gravitational pull. But when it gets to the Moon, the Moon is the closest body so its gravity will have the strongest effect on the spacecraft. If it flies past close enough and stays flying fast enough that it can’t be captured by the body to start orbiting it, that spacecraft will slingshot around. The spacecraft will get a boost of momentum and change in direction courtesy of some very clever planning by engineers on the ground.

But the side of the body matters. If the spacecraft flies past the trailing edge, it will get a bigger boost of momentum because it’s going with the direction of travel. If it flies past the leading edge, it will get a smaller boost and even lose some speed because it’s flying against the direction of the body’s travel.

Let’s go back to our Apollo-at-the-Moon example, but take it back to the start of the mission with the spacecraft sitting on the pad at Kennedy Space Centre. Every mission launched towards the east, taking advantage of the Earth’s rotation to need a little less fuel to get into orbit. From there, the next big mission event was the translunar injection or TLI burn. This changed Apollo’s orbit from a nearly circular one to an elliptical one with the apogee, the furthest point, somewhere near where the Moon would be in three days time — mission planners had to account for travel time over some 250,000 miles.

If Apollo passed by the Moon’s trailing edge, it would get an increase of momentum that would put it in an even larger orbit around the Earth. To get home, the crew would either be stuck in space a lot longer or use more fuel to make it back. This wasn’t a great option when consumables and fuel were both things crews didn’t have in abundance. But passing by the leading edge would have the opposite effect. It would act like a gravitational brake almost, changing the spacecraft’s path to an ellipse that would bring it straight back to Earth without any input from the crew.

So passing by the Moon’s leading edge brought a degree of safety into the mission, which was paramount because President Kennedy kind of made “returning him safely to the Earth” as part of the whole putting a man on the Moon thing. It also meant the crew needed to take fewer consumables with them. And another bonus was that entering the Moon’s orbit from the leading edge side demanded less fuel — again keeping consumables down.

The end result is that Apollo’s trajectory looked like a figure 8!

Now, sticklers will point out that only Apollo 13 actually flew the full figure 8. Which is true. When the service module oxygen tank ruptured, the crew didn’t have their big engine to make all the necessary burns so took advantage of the safety of the free return trajectory. But at the end of the day, every mission flew this same basic shape. They all entered the Moon’s orbit from the leading edge side, never the trailing edge side. Apollos 11 and 12 started on a path that would have the option of the free return trajectory should something go wrong, then adjusted to get into orbit and land. Later missions didn’t; NASA was more confident in the spacecraft so took a path that was simpler for the landing without this built-in safety.

And if we want to get super pedantic, the figure 8 is sort of an illusion. We only see it when we sketch out the flight assuming the Moon isn’t moving. Other representations show the flight as two separate loops at the ends of curves, sort of. But the spacecraft is still passing that leading edge!

Main source, and also the book to check for more info: “How Apollo Flew to the Moon” by W. David Woods.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Uncategorized
• john

Sorry, but you’re still wrong (see comments on youtube). In Newtonian physics, the rotation of a round object has no effect on the trajectory of a passing object.

• Maksim

What Amy needs is to drop the term rotation and stick to the leading and trailing sides as defined by the Moon’s orbit around the Sun. Being in front of the Moon in its orbit will bleed your velocity off, while being behind it will give you a boost.

• Valentin

i Agree, it’s the direction of the velocity of the moon that matters.

• Kris

Amy, it’s not rotation about its axis. It’s direction of travel (or you could even say velocity since it has a little to do with speed as well as direction) around its parent body. Watch Scott Manley’s video on gravity assists.

• Pancho Rivas

I’m confused. I thought the moon did not rotate and always maintained the same face to the earth– which is why there is a Dark Side that we never see. Is this a massive chasm in my Lunar education? Or did they introduce Lunar rotation in this explanation because, hey, the started with Earth’s rotation and they just kept going?

• lcs1956

The Moon maintains the same face to the Earth but it is spinning with respect to an inertial frame fixed in space (with respect to the stars for example).

• lcs1956

Aside from the rotation gaffe, the basic point was that passing in front of the Moon guaranteed a free-return trajectory. However it was gutsy, since the Moon is coming right at you at 2300 mph just a few hundred miles away and the time of arrival has to be correct within a few minutes. Its like jumping in front of a freight train, except its the MOON!

• Dean Simono

I don’t understand the whole concept, am kind of slow and I do actually have pretty severe dyslexia…but I think I got the general idea of what you were explaining, I could actually watch as you discussed cleaning out a fishbowl and be perfectly content, such a lovely and knowledgeable personality…Keep up the Great work and don’t let nobody git you down.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE

### Vintage Space

Vintage Space is all about digging into the minutia of the space age. Rather than retelling glossy stories of astronauts, Vintage Space peels back that veneer to look at the real stories -- the innovations that failed, the unrealized technologies, and the human elements that are less publicity-friendly so often remain buried. Gaining a clear picture of spaceflight's past ultimately helps us understand our present position in space and have a more realistic expectation of what the future might bring.