Two Men Are HIV-Free After Bone Marrow Transplants

By Lisa Raffensperger | July 3, 2013 11:06 am
hiv virus on lymphocyte

Scanning electron micrograph of HIV (green spheres) on human lymphocytes. Courtesy CDC

Two HIV-positive patients who underwent bone marrow transplants have stopped taking HIV medications and have since shown no signs of the virus returning, doctors reported today.

The news raises hopes that someday existing AIDS drugs, which simply manage the disease, could be replaced by a cure. But doctors caution that it’s too early to gauge whether the treatment will have lasting effects.

The two men had been infected with HIV for about 30 years. They both developed a cancer, lymphoma, which required a bone marrow transplant. Doctors at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center in Boston transplanted healthy donor marrow into the patients a few years ago.

Soon after, levels of the HIV virus in their blood steadily dropped until they were undetectable. Still, the men remained on antiretroviral drugs until earlier this year.

One patient has now been off antiretroviral drug treatment for 15 weeks and the other for seven weeks, and no signs of the virus have been detected in either patient so far. The findings were announced today at the International Aids Society conference in Kuala Lumpur.

Doctors think that the continued antiretroviral treatment kept the transplanted immune cells from becoming infected with HIV. Usually bone marrow recipients stop taking their AIDS medicines to undergo chemotherapy after the transplant. But the two men received only mild chemotherapy and remained healthy enough to continue their HIV medications during cancer treatments.

Precedent for a cure

A similar result was reported in 2007 when Timothy Brown, known as the “Berlin patient,” became the first person cured of AIDS. Brown also had a bone marrow transplant to treat cancer. However his marrow came from a rare donor who was resistant to HIV due to a mutation in the CCR5 gene.

The two Boston patients received cells without this mutation. Thus it may be that the marrow transplant itself, rather than the mutation, is the critical component of the cure.

Bone marrow transplants are, however, not without risks. Graft-versus-host disease can develop, wherein the recipient’s immune system attacks the transplanted cells. Patients face a 15-20 percent mortality rate within the first few years. Thus a transplant for the average AIDS patient is unlikely to be the best course of treatment.

But with today’s announcement, researchers have a new and promising avenue of investigation toward the dynamics of AIDS and thus a future cure that exploits similar tactics to beat the disease.

 

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Health & Medicine, top posts
MORE ABOUT: AIDS, HIV, immune system
  • http://www.placidway.com/ PlacidWay Medical Tourism

    So even without mutation the two was cured by Bone marrow transplant., this is actually good news! We are now progressing in terms of fighting HIV virus. But still if it is effective even without mutation what more if we can have donors who are resistant to HIV, problem solved right? The next problem was the donor and the expensive cost of bone marrow transplant, probably people will prefer to go and have bone marrow transplant in India for it is more cheaper there.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

D-brief

Briefing you on the must-know news and trending topics in science and technology today.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »