Looking for relatedness in the HapMap Gujaratis

By Razib Khan | March 17, 2011 11:34 pm

Recently I was looking at a 3-D PCA animation which Zack generated from the Harappa Ancestry Project data set. Click the link and come back. Notice the outlier clusters? The Burusho are straightforward, they seem to have low levels of Tibetan admixture. But what about the Gujarati cluster? Again, we see what we’ve seen before, the fractioning out of the Gujaratis in PCA into two groups, one a tight cluster, and the other relatively widely distributed. This prompted me to look more closely at the HapMap Gujarati sample. Today I was exploring the question with Plink’s identity-by-descent feature. First I’ll start out with a smaller data set, my family (father, mother, sibling 1, sibling 2, and myself), and an Indian (from Uttar Pradesh) and Pakistani as unrelated individuals. I merged out 23andMe derived genotypes, and with ~900,000 markers calculated pairwise IBD:

./plink --bfile IBDControl --genome

Here are the relevant results:

Individual 1 Individual 2 Z0 Z1 Z2 PI_HAT DST PPC RATIO
Indian Father 0.768 0.027 0.205 0.218 0.760 0.160 1.940
Indian Mother 0.782 0.010 0.209 0.214 0.759 0.026 1.886
Indian Razib 0.767 0.032 0.202 0.218 0.759 0.500 2.000
Indian Sibling1 0.769 0.025 0.206 0.219 0.760 0.198 1.949
Indian Sibling2 0.766 0.032 0.203 0.219 0.760 0.685 2.030
Indian Pakistani 0.781 0.017 0.203 0.211 0.758 0.533 2.005
Father Mother 0.776 0.018 0.207 0.215 0.759 0.284 1.965
Father Razib 0.002 0.777 0.221 0.610 0.851 1.000 450.800
Father Sibling1 0.001 0.785 0.214 0.606 0.850 1.000 898.800
Father Sibling2 0.002 0.779 0.220 0.609 0.851 1.000 643.143
Father Pakistani 0.778 0.019 0.203 0.213 0.758 0.201 1.950
Mother Razib 0.002 0.788 0.211 0.605 0.849 1.000 639.429
Mother Sibling1 0.002 0.781 0.218 0.608 0.850 1.000 639.857
Mother Sibling2 0.002 0.782 0.216 0.607 0.850 1.000 447.900
Mother Pakistani 0.779 0.020 0.201 0.211 0.758 0.052 1.904
Razib Sibling1 0.183 0.408 0.409 0.613 0.866 1.000 11.386
Razib Sibling2 0.194 0.432 0.374 0.590 0.858 1.000 11.491
Razib Pakistani 0.781 0.016 0.203 0.211 0.758 0.933 2.095
Sibling1 Sibling2 0.236 0.412 0.351 0.557 0.849 1.000 9.413
Sibling1 Pakistani 0.777 0.024 0.199 0.211 0.758 0.327 1.973
Sibling2 Pakistani 0.774 0.024 0.202 0.214 0.758 0.443 1.991

You can infer some things without even knowing what the columns mean. Notice that there are differences between parent-child, sibling-sibling, and unrelated comparisons. The distance measure, DST, is basically exactly the same as the genome-wide comparison in 23andMe. Either the web app is running Plink, or, it’s using the exact same algorithm. Z0 = IBD 0, Z1 = IBD 1, and Z2 = IBD 2. Notice that with my siblings I have a fair amount of IBD 2, but far less with my parents. That’s because parents give you one copy, but you can share zero, one, or two, of a gene with your siblings. In contrast, with our parents there is hardly any IBD = 0, since they’re guaranteed to give you one copy. I assume that the IBD = 2 in that case is population wide fixation of a variant. Notice in the last column that there are different values for unrelated individuals (~2), siblings (~10), and parent-children  (~500).

I ran a similar test among the Gujaratis. Remember that I’ve labeled them Gujarat_A and Gujarati_B based on PCA clusters, where the latter form a tight population cluster, and the former do not. Here are the mean pairwise DST values with the groups of pairs:

Mean of all: 0.746

Mean of Gujarati_A only: 0.744

Mean of Gujarati_B only: 0.749

Mean of Gujarati_A and Gujarati_B pairs only: 0.745

Gujarati_B are marginally closer to each other than Gujarati_A. I’m not sure these DST values are totally comparable to the ones from the 23andMe files. I’ll show you why. I constrained the pairs to those where the RATIO was > 2.5. Here’s what I found:

Individual 1 Individual 2 Z0 Z1 Z2 PI_HAT DST PPC RATIO PopX PopY
NA20900 NA20891 0.003 0.974 0.023 0.510 0.842 1.000 188.250 Gujarati_A Gujarati_A
NA20909 NA20910 0.003 0.970 0.027 0.512 0.842 1.000 140.438 Gujarati_A Gujarati_A
NA20891 NA20907 0.412 0.557 0.032 0.310 0.803 1.000 5.730 Gujarati_A Gujarati_A
NA20900 NA20907 0.684 0.292 0.024 0.170 0.775 1.000 3.251 Gujarati_A Gujarati_A

Notice that Z2 ~ 0, in contrast to the calculations above. I assume someone reading this knows that there’s a simple reason for this, so do tell. The IBD estimates for 23andMe always struck me as too high. In any case, to my surprise the definitely related individuals seem to be in the Gujarati_A cluster! What’s going on there? My first thought is that I messed up the data, or, I coded something incorrectly. I assume that this was double-checked before it got into the HapMap data set. Has anyone else seen this weird result? If not, I assume I made an error (that’s kind of my working model right now actually).

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Genetics, Genomics
  • http://johnhawks.net/weblog John Hawks

    I started working with the Gujarati sample a couple of years ago and went to talk to a South Asianist about it. His immediate reaction when I described the sample was that it would give all kinds of weird results because the Houston Gujarati community is really uncharacteristic in many ways, mostly Brahmins from the same areas and therefore full of distant relatives.

    I didn’t see it much when I was running the samples, but I wasn’t looking for particular pairs like this.

  • http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/ Zack

    I removed NA20900 and NA20909 from my datasets due to they being too similar to other samples. I used simple IBS similarity. Their IBD numbers are really weird though.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Gene Expression

This blog is about evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices. Please beware that comments are aggressively moderated. Uncivil or churlish comments will likely get you banned immediately, so make any contribution count!

About Razib Khan

I have degrees in biology and biochemistry, a passion for genetics, history, and philosophy, and shrimp is my favorite food. In relation to nationality I'm a American Northwesterner, in politics I'm a reactionary, and as for religion I have none (I'm an atheist). If you want to know more, see the links at http://www.razib.com

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

RSS Razib’s Pinboard

Edifying books

Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »